Tuesday, August 31, 2010

10 Best Pieces of All Time / 10 Favourite Pieces

I was asked this the other day. What a hard question! My tentative answer (in decreasing order of awesomeness):

(Mozart) piano concerto no. 23 in A, K.488
(Bach) Brandenburg concerto no. 4 in G, BWV 1049
(Beethoven) piano concerto no. 4 in G, Op. 58
(Beethoven) piano sonata no. 26 in Eb, Op. 81a
(Mozart) piano sonata no. 12 in F, K. 332
(Schumann) piano concerto in a, Op. 54
(Haydn) cello concerto no. 2 in D, Hob. VIIb
(Mozart) fantasia in c, K. 475
(Chopin) piano concerto no. 1 in e, Op. 11
(Rachmaninov) piano concerto no. 2 in c, Op. 18

I also reallyreallyreally really like (in no particular order):
(Mozart) piano concerto no. 9 in Eb, K. 271
(Chopin) Étude no. 6 in g#, Op. 25
(Bach) violin partita no. 2 in d, BWV 1004
(Mozart) piano concerto no. 19 in F, K. 459
(Bach) concerto no. 2 in E, BWV1053
(Haydn) piano sonata no. 52 in Eb, Hob. 16
(Bach) piano partita no. 2 in c, BWV826
(Mozart) piano concerto no. 21 in C, K. 467
(Mozart) piano quartet no. 2 in Eb, K. 493
(Mozart) piano quartet no. 1 in g, K. 478
(Beethoven) piano sonata no. 21 in C, Op. 53
(Beethoven) piano sonata no. 23 in f, Op. 57
(Beethoven) triple concerto in C, Op. 56
(Bach) Goldberg Variations, BWV 988
(Mozart) Requiem in d, K. 626
(Bach) English, French, Cello suites
(Schubert) violin sonatas

This would be a good time to mention my favourite keys: Eb and d. And you people (pieces and keys)?

Also, a random musing: when learning a movement of a piece, to what degree is one obliged to also learn the other movements? I should think, obviously it's preferable, because it helps you put what you're playing in context: the movements were meant to be read, played, heard, however you experience it, together. I'm pretty sure most people listen to all the movements of a piece together, but learning two or more other movements is no mean feat. Hmm?

Sunday, August 15, 2010

News: Obama Backs Islam Center Near 9/11 Site

Obama: "As a citizen, and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country."


Good for him. It looks like it's actually going to get built, despite the efforts of Sarah Palin & Co ("Pls reject it in interest of healing," "Peaceful Muslims, pls refudiate[ the Ground Zero mosque]").


By the way, in response to questions about the word "refudiate" (see: repudiate) Sarah Palin then went on to compare herself to Shakespeare and proposed adding the following words into English: "'Refudiate,' 'misunderestimate,' 'wee-wee'd up'."

Going to Taiwan! (+ Random Stuff)

I leave tomorrow morning. Friday was my last day at Baidu! I'll post a link to the project once it goes up (Monday?).

Also here's a great recent article of my mom's. And here's a good one of my dad's, for good measure.

And an awesome blend of math and cooking (courtesy of I Love Charts):

Thursday, August 12, 2010

Pencil Tip Carvings

Wow, these are awesome. Apparently the guy (Brazilian-born carpenter Dalton Ghetti) who does them refuses to use a magnifying glass, too. What an innovative artist!



Lufthansa Pillow Fight

Lufthansa is a great airline, I've found. They're also the first airline I took alone (when I was 10, from Moscow to Switzerland). Recently a pillow fight erupted in economy class on a flight of theirs from Tel Aviv to Frankfurt between German and French passengers. A stewardess happily joined in.

(link is in the post title, but can't be accessed behind the GFW)

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Chinese pronunciations

Here's a chart I made (thanks to Frank for suggesting suffixes and prefixes I forgot about) after becoming curious as to why there are are characters pronounced "jiang" and "liang," for example, but not "miang." You can also go to http://www.stanford.edu/~bgwines/Hanzi to see the whole chart as one instead of as split into there. 



Of course, the next question after making the chart was, what's the proportion of pronunciations that do exist to those that don't but hypothetically could! It turns out it's 407:385, which means 51.38% of pronunciations exist.

In the process of making the chart, I ran into a few pronunciations that I never knew existed:
• 拽 zhuai1 (only two characters pronounced zhuai)
• 欻 chua1 (the only character that's pronounced chua; it's an onomatopoeic sound)
• 龊 chuo4
• 剖 pou1 (only five characters  pronounced pou)
• 虐 nue4  (only two characters, pronounced nue, and there's some ambiguity as to the pronunciation should be romanized as nüe, instead, which makes more sense based on how -ü is pronounced. 战略的略 would also be -üe, but 确实的确 or, actually, any other que is definitely -ue, not -üe. But most 输入软件 don't distinguish the two for nue, but only list lue, not lüe. Since there are only two characters pronounced nue/nüe, I just decided to list this character under -ue so as to not make a whole 'nother column, which would have brought the existent : non-existent ratio to 407:399)

Also, some very common characters like 嗲, 得, 能 and 谁(alt. pronunciation: shui3) are either the only within their pronunciation group or one of very few (能 is the only neng anybody is likely to ever see outside of a list of all nengs, the others are 而(多音字!), 竜, 耐(也是耐心的耐) and 螚). It's not uncommon for pronunciation groups to restrict themselves only to certain tones, i.e. there's only shuo1 and shuo4, no second or third tone.

The hyphens represent a non-existent pronunciation, and the characters are (more or less) arbitrarily chosen from all the characters that are pronounced a particular way.

Note: I couldn't type the only biang, of course, but you can see it here.


a
ai
an
ao
ang
e
ei
en
er
eng
i

b
c
ch
d
f
g
h
j
k
l
m
n
p
q
r
s
sh
t
w
x
西
y
z
zh


ia
ie
in
iu
ian
iao
ing
iang
iong
o
ou

b
便
biang1
c
ch
d
f
g
h
j
k
l
m
n
p
q
r
s
sh
t
w
x
y
z
zh


ong
ü
ue
u
ui
uo
un
ua
uai
uan
uang

b
c
ch
d
f
g
h
怀
j
k
l
绿
m
n
p
q
r
s
sh
t
w
x
y
z
zh