Showing posts with label Stanford. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stanford. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Classes and Fire Tornadoes

Settled on classes this quarter, in case anyone's curious:
• Music 21 (music theory)
• Phil 80 (consciousness, a WIM class)
• CS 103 (math and logic in CS)
• Russian, before it's too late
• ME110 (sketching), which is one unit
• Social Dance 2 (swing, waltz), which is one unit

In other news, just when you thought nature couldn't get any more awesome:

Here's a video from the AP and some pictures from National Geographic.

Thursday, September 23, 2010

First Football Game!


Last week I went to my first football game ever! It was Stanford vs. Wake Forest. We did very well: 28:64, to Stanford! At one point the quarterback ran 50 yards to make a touchdown; apparently that's a big deal. I'm probably going to try and go to Big Game (vs. Kal), which means I'll need to go to a few more to rack up enough points.

Monday, September 6, 2010

[iso2014questions] Like Minded Christians Unite

A friend of mine and I are co-ordinating this year's International Student Orientation (ISO) at Stanford. There's an e-mail address posted on the ISO website for incoming freshmen to send questions, which are usually about things like visas or double-checking they've signed up and so on. One day we got a rather different e-mail, from someone who hadn't signed up, with the subject line "Like Minded Christians Unite." Here's the e-mail (quoted verbatim except for e-mail addresses, which are taken out):



From: Scott Bland
Date: July 10, 2010 12:46:09 PM GMT+08:00
Subject: [iso2014questions] Like Minded Christians Unite

Hello My name is Scott.  I live in Lima, Ohio.  This is a ONE TIME Mailing to simply share with you about a NEW program within the United States that is offering to TOTALLY ELIMINATE grocery bills!

I am in search for like-minded people that can see the opportunity within this NEW nationwide program that is helping to feed those in need.  I believe we are to help one another to help one another.  Please read this email in its entirety, because it could possibly change your life as it did mine.

8 out of 10 who see this will think this is just another scam and click out.  So many are skeptical and I WAS the same way.  However, I am so glad that I was 1 of the 2 who believed that maybe this could be real, and I JOINED! I need open minded people that can see what this business can offer to you and others.  It is STILL very possible to be involved in a legit online business.

How many do you know that eats on a daily basis!?  EVERYONE right?  You think these people would like some free groceries?  How many do you know that would like to make more money as they share this concept with others?  YOU!?  ME!?  

Most ads I see promise huge incomes fast and easy and they always tempt me and seem to good to be true and then there's always a catch.  With what I am about to share with you, there is NO catch.  It is exactly as it says it is.

Can You Really Eliminate Your Grocery Bill? I am here to tell you the facts about “MPB Today”, and What this recent “buzz” is all about. MPB Today is a wholesale grocery business that started in 2006. About 2 years ago they set up a website to sell groceries online at full retail price and began offering home delivery. In Early June, 2010, they decided to expand their services to other states, by opening their network marketing division and began selling $200 grocery vouchers for $200, that can be used to purchase groceries from their Florida store. You can immediately use your $200 Grocery Voucher to pay for groceries any time from the company’s fulfillment center in Florida, but if you pay a $10 annual admin fee you can participate in their INCREDIBLY LUCRATIVE Compensation Plan. 

If you Refer Just two Customers to “MPB Today” who both refer two customers, you will “cycle”, AND you will receive a compensation. Once this happens, you can order groceries through MPB Today’s grocery delivery service and the company will pay for shipping and handling, OR you can trade your grocery certificate for a $200 Walmart Gift Card PLUS you will receive $300. You will also receive ANOTHER $200 grocery voucher to start a NEW business center so you can cycle again and AGAIN!

This type of compensation plan is referred to as a “2 x 2 Follow Me Center”. You’ll only pay $200 one time for your FIRST grocery voucher, BUT you can get paid over and over and over again AND that $200 is ALL product, so it really is FREE to join!

Here are the some Key Summary Points of How This Works:

1. You pay $200 one time for a $200 grocery voucher, plus a $10 annual administration fee for your website. 

2. You can immediately use your $200 grocery voucher to buy groceries online from a fulfillment center in Florida. If you use your voucher immediately you’ll have to pay for shipping… BUT if you wait until after your first pay cycle to use your voucher you will NOT have to pay for shipping and handling.

3. You Refer Just 2 People that also Want a way to Earn Free Groceries. And You help those 2 people, Refer 2 People, and Cycle! Get Paid Cash and $200 in Groceries!

4. Every time you cycle, you can trade your $200 grocery voucher for a $200 Walmart gift card. You’ll also receive $300 Cash, and You Get another $200 Grocery Voucher and be placed in another business center again. This happens over and over again, every time you cycle.

5. The more people you personally sponsor into “MPB Today”, the more often you will “cycle”. You could cycle several times a month, several times a week, even several times a day! There is no question that in these financial times people are having a tough time making ends meet. 

Can you see the potential that could have with your local church?  The ability to help people help people!!!  I LOVE IT.  I personally have cycled out and made about $2000 in TWO Weeks!!!  AND I get FREE GROCERIES via the Walmart card.

So, “MPB Today”, has provided an incredible opportunity, to provide us with a way to cut one of the biggest expenses we have, “Groceries”. We all have to EAT, which makes this product, a No-Brainer. So, How would you like to Get Paid, just by Referring others to this Incredible Business Opportunity, and showing them how they can earn Free Groceries too. This is a very unique and appealing opportunity, and those that join quickly, will be seriously compensated, as “MPB Today” starts attracting many people looking to save money on their groceries, and make money working from home. This is Truly a Win-Win Opportunity for Everyone! 

Scott Bland

Sunday, July 18, 2010

Gaits









This post was inspired by a discussion with my dad while walking the dogs. If you look at old paintings of horse races (see above) , their legs are completely outstretched in the front and back. These kinds of paintings, all before high-speed photography, were painted at a time when people didn't really know what horses looked like when they're running.

In 1878, our very own Leland Stanford settled the debate over whether horses are ever fully airborne while running: he organized the first ever example of a high-speed photo shoot (and hence the forerunner of motion picture technology) . Here's the photo, taken on June 10, 1878, at his Palo Alto track.

Here, I'll describe walking (actually the most complicated of gaits) :

The dog alternates between two and three legs supporting the body. Thus, there are eight 4C3 (three-leg combinations) plus 4C2 (two-leg combinations) minus the two combinations where you have the two front legs at the same time and then the two back legs at the sam time. That's four each. It's an eight-beat cycle, which means that after eight steps/lifts, it starts all over, like a video reaching the end and starting again. Each odd beat, for example, the dog has two paws down, and each even one it has three.

Viewing the odd and even beats separately, you can see that on each paw stays down for n beats, where n is the number of paws down on the particular beat. Thus, in the whole cycle, each paw stays down for n=2 + n=3 = 5 beats.

Here's a diagram for the odd beats (let the dot represent a placed paw) :
0 •  |  0 •  |  • 0  |  • 0
• 0  |  0 •  |  0 •  |  • 0
Which, if you think about it, is really the only way you can cycle through those four positions if you adhere to each paw staying down for two beats. There are six possible orderings of the four positions (4! arrangements, but /4 for the cycles) . If you think of the above ordering that we know works as the order 234 (1234) , then you see that to avoid jumping from a position to its opposite, i.e.:
|  0 •  |  • 0  | 
|  0 •  |  • 0  | 
or the equivalent other (the diagonal mirror) , you have to come up with an order that never pairs 2 and 4 together, like above, nor does it do so with 1 and 3, which would automatically follow -- because it's a cycle, hence it repeats, so 1243 still pairs 1 and 3 at the head and tail. So, to avoid such a pairing, your only other possibility is 1423. Or, you could work it out as ordering the letters abB such that the 'b' and the 'B' are never together, so you just fix one at the start (one possibility of the remaining 2! is good) and same for the other, which gives you 1+1=2 total ways to avoid the jump. So, for now let's just remember: there's only one position and its mirror that work.

As for the three-paw steps, you can view the cycle as each next beat. Like so (to view the whole eight-beat cycle, the i^th three-paw beat in this cycle is the beat right after the i^th two-paw step) :
0 •  |  • •  |  • 0  |  • •
• •  |  0 •  |  • •  |  • 0

What about the other five possibilities? For example, how about it be such that the paw that lifts is the next in an anti-clockwise or clockwise circle? As in,
0 •  |  • •  |  • •  |  • 0
• •  |  0 •  |  • 0  |  • •
? Well, if you combine that with the odd beats you get the following:
  1      2   3       4        5       6       7 8
0 • |  0 •  |  0 •  |  • •  |  • 0  |  • •  |  • 0  |  • 0
• 0 |  • •  |  0 •  |  0 •  |  0 •  |  • 0  |  • 0  |  • •
, where 
1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8
the front left paw goes 0|0|0|•|•|•|•|• , which is OK,
the front right paw goes •|•|•|•|0|•|0|0 , which is not,
the back left paw goes •|•|0|0|0|•|•|• , which is OK,
the back right paw goes 0|•|•|•|•|0|0|• , which is not.

front right and back left don't fit. The other five possibilities don't work, either -- but the mirror of the one that does works with our original mirror for the two-paw beats. So, basically, there are only two sets of beats that work for walking: the original that we worked out, and its mirror.

Here's some code I wrote up (quickly, so it's not very nice) you can compile to simulate walking (you'll have to #include iostream, vector, algorithm and iterator for it to compile -- I'd include it here, but the blog posting script treats it as an html tag) :

using namespace std;

void PrintEachPaw(const vector<string> &v) {
 cout << "In the order of FL, FR, BL, BR:\n";
 copy(v.begin(), v.end(), ostream_iterator<string>(cout, "\n"));
return;
}

void PrintEachBeat(const vector<string> &v) {
cout << endl;
for (size_t i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
for (size_t j = 0; j < 4; j++) {
if (j == 2)
cout << endl;
cout << v[j][i];
}
cout << endl << endl;
}
return;
}

int main (int argc, char *const argv[]) {
vector<string> v;
string a, b, c, d;
v.push_back(a);
v.push_back(b);
v.push_back(c);
v.push_back(d);
for (size_t i = 0; i < v.size(); i++) {
v[i] = "........";
for (int j = 0; j < 3; j++)
v[i][((i*2)+j)%8] = '0';
}
string temp = v[2];
v[2] = v[1];
v[1] = temp;
PrintEachPaw(v);
PrintEachBeat(v);
return 0;
}

Friday, June 25, 2010

Coming to like Rachmaninov (slowly) ?

Last year's winner of the Stanford Concerto Competition had their concert during Spring quarter this most recent academic, as always. When I went to the concert last year, the pianist (Jack Yang, then a Junior, if you know him) played Beethoven's fifth piano concerto, a really pretty, monstrously large piece. 'in my favourite key, too: Eb major. Anyway, the soloist for this most recent concert, whose name I can't remember, played Rachmaninov's third piano concerto. Before this I'd never listened to any Rachmaninov before, but the first movement, at least, stuck in my mind.

I started listening to music when I was about seventeen. For three or so months, I listened to what my dad listened to -- R&B and rock from when he grew up. Co-incidentally, at this time, I became more serious about playing piano. My previous teacher, from when we were in Russian, had never taught me anything about technique or interpretation. Or sight-reading, for that matter: I sight-read really terribly. After my first five years of playing, I was under the impression that to play a piece well was to play it as ostentatiously as possible, at the greatest speed possible while paying no attention to dynamics.

When we arrived in South Africa, my new teacher worked hard to undo everything my previous teacher had taught me. Eventually, she gave me had some impact. At this point, my dad started to like classical music, given that I was playing better. I then followed him. We started out listening to Alicia de Laroccha's really pretty recordings of the Mozart piano sonatas and then branched out slowly. When I got to college, I thought Beethoven was way too late a composer for me to like, 'cause I only liked Mozart (who still remains my favourite composer) and Bach (second-favourite) and Haydn. Slowly, through influence from friends, I came to like later and later composers. I would have said I've reached my limit with Chopin. Until, that is, I heard Rach 3. It seems, now, quite conceivable that I could eventually come to like some of Rachmaninov's music, even though I'd always dismissed him as "hotel music" or "elevator music." Part of it may be that he reminds me of Russia; I'm finding myself occasionally listening to some Tchaikovsky, too.

Perhaps I can no longer divide my music tastes purely chronologically: Liszt , for example, lived almost completely before Rachmaninov, yet I'm about as convinced as I can be that I'll never come to love his music. I can't group it as dissonant vs. non-dissonant, either, though that was once the case. Mozart, even, uses dissonance in wonderfully interesting ways -- just look at the C major string quartet or his absolutely gorgeous c minor fantasia.

What is it that makes composers like Liszt, Prokofiev, Stravinsky, Britten, Adams and others so different, then? They're different from each other, too. As much as I'd like to say that their music, collectively, just sounds random, it clearly isn't.

If I had to guess, I'd say that by far the majority of my musical friends are Romantic-era - oriented, with just a few Modern-oriented (modern classical) and even fewer preferring Baroque- and Classical-era music.

Friday, June 18, 2010

Sleep for Spring Quarter Sophomore Year

In the middle of Winter quarter this academic year I started recording my sleep. Here are two graphs and some data:
  • Average sleep time: 3:24.45
  • Average sleep length: 6 hours, 45.6144 minutes
  • Total sleep debt: 101 hours, 40 minutes
  • Time spent asleep: 554 hours, 20.4 minutes
  • % of time spent asleep: 28.1677%
(all-nighters are treated as sleeping at 24:00 for 0 minutes for calculation purposes)
The graphs are too large to fit nicely on a post, so here are the two URLs:


I'm hoping to keep a better schedule next quarter. Anyways, this quarter is way better than last quarter, when I pulled 7 or 8 all-nighters. Oh, well. That's what being a college student is like.